Features of biophilia application in interior environment of public buildings
Abstract
The purpose of the work is to determine the peculiarities of the biophilia concept, to find out the feasibility of using this tool in the interior of public buildings, to pay attention to its positive impact on the psycho-emotional state of a person, as well as to analyse the prospective development of the use of biophilia. Research methodology is based on systemic and environmental approaches, which allow considering the interior space and subject environment with the application of biophilia as a holistic project. The study has used the method of systematic analysis of specialised resources and scientific publications on the subject of the study; method of comparative analysis of similar objects; generalisation of information obtained in the process of research. Scientific and journalistic articles, domestic and foreign project development of spaces where this concept has been used became the source base of the research. The scientific novelty of the research consists in determining the features and means of biophilic design for their application in public spaces in the conditions of Ukraine, which creates an environment of life and promotes such social organisation and functioning of people that ensure the preservation and strengthening of their emotional state. Conclusions. Biophilia is one of the important ways to help people return to a life close to nature. It has been proven that satisfying a person’s inherent inclination to communicate with nature, biophilic design generates an emotional attachment to certain spaces and places. These emotional attachments motivate people to work productively, and they also motivate us to identify with the places where we live and to support them. Biophilic design promotes positive and permanent interaction and relations between people and the natural environment. Humans are a deeply social species whose safety and productivity depend on positive interactions in a spatial context. The research is motivated by the expansion and deepening of knowledge about the formation of the environment design with the use of the latest biophilia tool, which provides the possibility and can be used in the practice of designing natural environments. The research outcomes can be used in the practical activities of architects, designers and students of educational institutions of this specialisation
Keywords
Suggested citation
Copy citationReferences
Show all references[1] Berto, R., Makulan, N., & Barbiero, G. (2020). Does sustainability address perceived restoration? An exploratory study on Biosphera 2.0, a net zero energy house. Visions for Sustainability, 13, 17-30. doi: 10.13135/2384-8677/4181.
[2] Fromm, E.(2015). The anatomy of human destructiveness. Кyiv: AST Publishers.
[3] What Is and Is Not Biophilic Design? Metropolis. (2022). Retrieved from https://metropolismag.com/viewpoints/what-is-and-isnot-biophilic-design.
[4] Kellert, S., & Calabrese, E. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. Retrieved from https://www.biophilic-design.com/_files/ugd/21459d_81ccb84caf6d4bee8195f9b5af92d8f4.pdf.
[5] Capaldi, C., Passmore, H.-A., Nisbet, E., Zelenski, J.M., & Dopko, R.L. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(4), 1-16. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v5i4.449.
[6] Kals, Е., Shumaher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202. doi: 10.1177/00139169921972056.
[7] Schultz, P. (2001).The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.
[8] Stets, J., & Biga, Ch. (2003). Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology. Sociological Theory Journal, 21(4), 398-423. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9558.2003.00196.x.
[9] Mayer, S., & McPherson, F. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
[10] Davis, J., Green, J., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001.
[11] Nisbet, E., Zelenski, J., & Merfi, S. (2008). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715-740. doi: 10.1177/0013916508318748.
[12] Perkens, H. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 455-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004.
[13] Caperna, A., & Serafini, S. (2015). Biourbanism as new epistemological perspective between Science, Design and Nature. In Architecture & Sustainability: Critical perspectives. "Generating sustainability concepts from an architectural perspective". KU Leuven– Faculty of Engineering, Belgium.
[14] Kovalyov, Yu., Malik, T., & Hridina, L. (2021). Urban environment design: Multi-criteria optimization and smart technologies. Kyiv, Ukraine: Naukova dumka.