Innovative features of corporate identity development
Abstract
In 2024, a clear and recognisable visual identity becomes a key factor for success for any brand. Traditional approaches to developing a corporate style are no longer as effective as they once were, so there is a need for fresh and innovative solutions. This research aims to elucidate the interrelationships between various elements of corporate identity. The methodology encompasses generalisation, identification of common patterns based on acquired data, and logical analysis of existing knowledge. The research methods employed include a comprehensive analysis of specific works to isolate fundamentally similar operations. Furthermore, model the commonality of corporate style and its components as an integrated system to identify the forms of new elements. This study involves an in-depth examination of theoretical materials and a detailed analysis of case studies, focusing on key features that render the development of corporate identity innovative. These include visual identity, flexibility, storytelling, authenticity, universal design, personalisation, VR, AR, AI, and sustainability. Visual identity ensures brands are recognisable and memorable. Flexibility allows brands to adjust their visual elements across various platforms, maintaining consistency. Storytelling and authenticity build trust and loyalty by conveying a brand’s history and values. Universal design enhances reach by being inclusive. Personalisation tailours identity to individual preferences, creating relevant experiences. VR and AR offer immersive experiences, enhancing brand engagement. AI facilitates dynamic brand elements that evolve based on real-time data. A sustainable approach aligns brands with consumer demand for eco-friendly practices. In summary, the innovative development of corporate identity is characterised by a multifaceted approach that integrates visual identity, adaptability, storytelling, inclusivity, personalisation, immersive technologies, AI, and sustainability. Each of these elements contributes to a cohesive and compelling brand presence that resonates with contemporary consumers. Implementing these innovative principles to carry out projects will help create a unique and dynamic corporate style that stands out in the competitive market, emotionally influences the audience, and contributes to success
Keywords
Suggested citation
Copy citationReferences
Show all references[1] Aaker, J., Benet-Martinez, V., & Garolera, J. (2001). Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 492-508. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.492.
[2] Balmer, J.M.T. (2001). Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing Seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 248-291.
[3] Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9-15). doi: 10.1145/2181037.2181040.
[4] Di Lauro, S., Tursunbayeva, A., Antonelli, G., & Martinez, M. (2020). Organizational and corporate identity on social media: A literature review. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(4), 53-66. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v15n4p53
[5] Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
[6] Fombrun, C., & Rindova, V. (1998). Reputation management in global 1000 firms: A benchmarking study. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(3), 213-233.
[7] Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 3025-3034). doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.377.
[8] Heller, S., & Chwast, S. (2011). Graphic style: From Victorian to New Century. (3rd ed.). New York: Harry N. Abrams.
[9] Kapferer, J.-N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking. (5th ed.). London: Kogan Page.
[10] Keller, K.L. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2-3), 139-155. doi: 10.1080/13527260902757530.
[11] Manovich, L. (2002). The language of new media. New York: MIT Press.
[12] Melewar, T., & Jenkins, E. (2002). Defining the corporate identity construct. Corporate Reputation Review, 5, 76-90. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540166.
[13] Müller-Brockmann, J. (2021). Grid systems in graphic design. Switzerland: Niggli Verlag.
[14] Nielsen, J., & Loranger, H. (2006). Prioritizing web usability. Indianapolis: New Riders.
[15] Official website of DaliWin. (2024). Retrieved from https://dalistrategies.com/ua/yak-vizualna-identifikacziya-brendu-mozhe-dopomogti-vashomu-biznesu.
[16] Olins, W. (2017). Corporate identity: Making business strategy visible through design. Boston: Harvard Business Review.
[17] Papanek, V. (2020). Design for the real world. London: Thames&Hudson.
[18] Pharmaceutical encyclopaedia. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.pharmencyclopedia.com.ua/article/398/firmovij-stil.
[19] Poulin, R. (2023). Design school: Layout. A practical guide for students and designers. Gloucester: Rockport Publishers.
[20] Stuart, H. (1999). Towards a definitive model of the corporate identity management process. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4), 200-207. doi: 10.1108/13563289910299328.
[21] The power of storytelling in building brand identity. (2024). Retrieved from https://fastercapital.com/content/The-Power-of-Storytelling-in-Building-a-Brand-Identity.html.
[22] Wang, X., & Zhang, L. (2021). The role of user-generated content in shaping corporate identity. Marketing Science, 40(2), 237-256.