Domestic humanistic tradition and Ukrainian vocabulary as primary sources for scientific terminology in professional areas of environment creation
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to find domestic lexical definitions of architecture, urbanism, and environmental design. The methodology of the research is an interdisciplinary synthesis of knowledge based on dialectics (H. Hegel) and the general theory of systems (L. von Bertalanffy). Scientific novelty. For the first time, the author has analysed the problem of the completeness of the domestic terminology on environment creation to express original meanings according to the Cyrillic humanistic tradition, and specialisations of activity. It has been proposed to introduce into scientific circulation a general definition of a group of professional artistic directions for creating an environment for human life as a hierarchical environmental image creation, the purpose of which is the integral beauty of spatial forms. Conclusions. The content of the borrowed terminology requires a more careful selection, as it is intended to enrich the vocabulary and clarify relevant industry concepts and professional specialisations, in particular, according to international qualification definitions. However, lexical borrowings do not have sufficient potential for worldview, mental-cognitive compliance with the national linguistic environment. In order to ensure national philosophical goal setting, in accordance with the national Slavic-Greek-Latin tradition of a complete and true Living Word, we need, along with borrowed names and terminology, to use primarily national, including Old Slavic, vocabulary in quality of the main methodological one. The domestic humanistic tradition, the peculiarities of word formation and the lexical fund of the Ukrainian literary language make it possible to return to wider use the national name of the content and purpose of an artistic composition (leepota) and to introduce into scientific circulation the natural definition of object-spatial arts, namely "environmental imagery" as well as «hierarchical environmental imagery»
Keywords
Suggested citation
Copy citationReferences
Show all references[1] Bodnar, O. (2005). Current issues of modern design theory. In Modern problems of research, restoration and preservation of cultural heritage: Collection of scientific works on art history, architectural history and cultural studies (pp. 22-27). Kyiv: Publishing House "A+S".
[2] Dyomin, M.M. (1995). Urbanization. Architecture: Short dictionary guide. Kyiv: Budivelnyk.
[3] Etymological dictionary of the Ukrainian language. (1982). Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
[4] Etymological dictionary of the Ukrainian language. (1985). Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
[5] Karavanskiy, S. (2000). Practical dictionary of synonyms of the Ukrainian language. Kyiv: Ukrainian Book.
[6] Kondel-Perminova, N.M. (2006). For the history of architectural and build education in Ukraine. In Modern problems of art education in Ukraine. Art education in Ukraine: Problems of development in the context of the Bologna process (pp. 107-126).
[7] Marder, A.P. (1995). Designe. Architecture: Short dictionary guide. Kyiv: Budivelnyk.
[8] Mosenkis, Y. (2001). Method of linguistic interpretation of art in the study of Trypillia and Aegean cultures. East and West in Possible Cultural Connections, 26-28.
[9] Mosenkis, Y.L. (2006). Ukrainian language in the Eurasian space: Trypillia genesis of melodiousness and distant family ties. Kyiv: Publishing House "A+S".
[10] Nakonechna, G. (1999). Ukrainian scientific and technical terminology. Lviv: Kalvariya.
[11] Nepyivoda, N.F. (1997). Language of scientific and technical literature (functional and stylistic aspect). Kyiv: LLC "International Financial Agency".
[12] Panko, T.I., Kochan, I.M., & Matsuk, G.P. (1994). Ukrainian terminology. Lviv: Svit.
[13] Puchkov, A.A. (2008). Poetics of ancient architecture. Kyiv: Feniks.
[14] Sverediuk, U.D. (2020). Latin heritage of Ukraine as a standard in the philosophy of the heart of Hryhoriy Skovoroda: Symbolism of the emblematic poetry of Teofan Prokopovych. Scientific developments of European countries in the area of philological researches. Riga: Publishing House “Baltija Publishing”.
[15] Bussagli, M. (2003). To understand the architecture. Firenze-Milano: Giunti Editore.
[16] Frank Lloyd Wright / Bruce Brooks Pfeiffer; Edited by Peter Gӧssel, Gabriele Leuthӓsser. Kӧln: TASCHEN GmbH.
[17] Ragon, M. (1958). About modern architecture. Paris.
[18] Dictionary of the Old Slavonic language (1958).
[19] Wright, F.L. (1953). The future of architecture. New York: Horizon Press.