Article Volume 25, No. 2, 2023

Body without organs model of corporeality as a productive corporeal paradigm in Steve Paxton’s concept of contact improvisation

Olga Babych
Received 12.07.2023 Revised 22.11.2023 Accepted 20.12.2022 Pages 16–21 596 Views

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to reveal the features of postmodern dance through the prism of the concept "body without organs" and to analyse the defined model of corporeality as a productive bodily paradigm in S. Paxton's contact improvisation. Research methodology. The analytical, typological, historical and cultural method, the method of cultural analysis (to understand the cultural meanings of the "body without organs" model of corporeality, which are revealed and constructed by postmodern dance practices), the phenomenological method, which contributed to the understanding of dance as a special type of socio-culturally oriented bodily practices, were applied, as well as generalisation method. Scientific novelty. The concept of "body without organs" is studied in the theoretical works of A. Artaud, as well as within the framework of the philosophy of postmodern corporeality of J. Deleuze and F. Guattari; the question of the body and dance as a possible overcoming of its automatisms is considered. The concept of postmodern dance along the lines of the "body without organs" model was analysed and its features as a productive bodily paradigm in the paradigm of contact improvisation by S. Paxton was revealed. Conclusions. In accordance with the specifics of postmodernism, the concept of "body without organs" is positioned as the result of a meaningful application of the fundamental idea about the immanent creative potential of the rhizome (a decentralised semantic environment to the phenomenon of corporeality. In the dimension of postmodern dance, the "body without organs" model has become the most productive bodily paradigm in Steve Paxton’s contact improvisation. S. Paxton’s concept, within which contact improvisation is considered as a specific formation of "spherical space", the result of a change in spatial-kinaesthetic orientation within a short time, involves focusing on the boundaries of body space, understanding its inner essence in relation to external space, the birth of movement in the process communication. Like most postmodern dance practices, contact improvisation is not focused on the final result, but is focused on the continuity of the process and the transformation of the aesthetic experience. According to S. Paxton, sustained movement and spontaneous movement are the poles of the spectrum of possibilities that define his research, as technical dance provides a basis for thinking about improvisation – dance techniques provide information about how movement affects the structure of the body. The model of the "body without organs", which is not limited by any standards of movements, in a duet is revealed in a variety of relationships with the partner’s body. Both bodies balance on the rules of continuous contact, weight transfer, and balance to ultimately acquire newly formed capabilities

Show full abstract

Keywords

Suggested citation

Copy citation
Babych, О. (2023). Body without organs model of corporeality as a productive corporeal paradigm in Steve Paxton’s concept of contact improvisation. Culture and Contemporaneity, 25(2), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-0285.2.2023.293738

References

Show all references

[1] Zhuravliova, A.V. (2021). Contact improvisation in the context of social dance of the 21st century: Features of the open dance form "jam". Bulletin of the National Academy of Culture and Arts Management, 4, 108-112. doi: 10.32461/2226-3209.4.2021.250268.

[2] Koliieva, I. (2014). "Instability" of the gender subject as a key concept of sexuality in the philosophy of postmodernismUkrainian Almanac, 16, 250-255.

[3] Karivets, I. (2007). Understanding the body in postmodern French philosophyBulletin of the  Lviv Polytechnic National University. Philosophical Sciences, 661, 29-34.

[4] Potapenko, Ya. (2011). Phenomenon of the body in the concepts of postmodernism: The historical dimension of the problemEast, 7(114), 136-140.

[5] Sokhan, I., Rykhalska, O., Zamlynnyi, O., & Mosiichuk, Yu. (2021). Contact improvisation according to Steve Paxton: The principle of free movement as a connection between dancers. Young Scientist, 10(98), 35-38. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2021-10-98-9.

[6] Turash, D.Ya., & Domazar, S.O. (2019). Multidimensionality of improvisation techniques in modern dance. Young Scientist, 11(75), 866-871. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2019-11-75-184.

[7] Chaplinska, O.V. (2016). Zh.-L. Nancy: Philosophical Reflections on the Body. Bulletin of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University. Philosophical Sciences, 1(82), 137-141.

[8] Artaud, A. (1958). The theater and its double. New York: Grove Press.

[9] Artaud, A. (1988). To have done with the Judgement of God. In: SONTAG, Susan (Org.). Antonin Artaud: Selected Writings. Berkeley: University of California Press, 555–569.

[10] Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. New York: Columbia University Press.

[11] Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2005). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

[12] Nietzsche, F. (2007). On the genealogy of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[13] Paxton, S. (1973). Solo dancing. Contact Quarterly, 2(3), 16-32.

[14] Saccol, D. (2014). Matiuzzi Pacheco. The discipline of bodies in the contemporary scene. DAPesquisa, Florianópolis, 9, 11, 1-10.

[15] Silva, A.L. (2021). Antonin Artaud and José Saramago: chaos and cosmos. Literature Magazine Juçara, Caxias, 5, 1, 198-207.