Cultural and sociological studies: Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary fields
Abstract
The relevance of the research topic stems from the necessity to define the boundaries and space of interdisciplinary interactions between cultural studies and sociology. The objective of this work was to identify the interdisciplinary connections and distinctions between these two fields. The study employed methods such as qualitative analysis, comparative analysis, and historical-logical reconstruction. The results demonstrated that the integration of cultural and sociological studies requires strong interdisciplinary connections to foster heuristic and innovative outcomes. It was established that interactions between cultural studies and sociology often take place within the “attraction-repulsion” dynamic, driven by long-standing debates over the conceptualisation of core categorical systems, such as art, ethnicity, religion, and ideologies. These disputes have shaped the interdisciplinary relationships, leading to both convergence and divergence in the approaches of each field. The research also found that the use of specific sociological methods for studying cultural forms is limited due to the interdisciplinary application of various research technologies, techniques, and methodologies. To develop the sociology of culture as an integral interdisciplinary field, emphasis should be placed on building connections with value-oriented knowledge, such as the philosophy of culture and ontology of culture. The practical significance of this study lies in its potential to inform the development of new research programs and enhance the teaching of cultural and sociological disciplines in higher education institutions. The findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the interdisciplinary dynamics at play and offer a basis for further research and educational advancement in these fields
Keywords
Suggested citation
Copy citationReferences
Show all references[1] Alexander, J.C. (2019). The societalization of social problems: Recent social crises and the cultural dislocations of societalization theory. American Sociological Review, 1-30. doi: 10.1177/1368431019830980.
[2] Baldwin, E. (2004). Introducing cultural studies. (revised 1st ed.). Harlow Essex: Pearson.
[3] Barker, C., & Jane, E.A. (2000). Cultural studies: Theory and practice. (5th ed.). London: Sage.
[4] Barry, A., & Born, G. (2013). Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203584279.
[5] Bilchenko, Y., & Kalyta, T. (2019). Social and philosophical cultural studies: Paradoxes of scientific reflection on culture. Scientific Bulletin of Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University. Series “Philosophical Sciences”, 12, 3-9.
[6] Blumer, H. (1990). Industrialization as an agent of social change: A critical analysis. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
[7] Bourricaud, F. (1981). The sociology of Talcott Parsons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[8] Chan, T.W., & Goldthorpe, J. (2022). Social stratification and cultural consumption: The visual arts in England. Poetics, 35(2), 168-190. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2007.05.002.
[9] Choi, B.C.K., & Pak, A.W.P. (2019). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity: Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351-364.
[10] During, S. (1993). The cultural studies reader. London: Routledge.
[11] Johnson, R. (1986-1987). What is cultural studies anyway? Social Text, 16, 38-80. doi: 10.2307/466285.
[12] Luhmann, N. (1970). Sociological Enlightenment 1. Essays on the theory of social systems. Wiesbaden: Springer.
[13] McLennan, G. (2006). Sociological cultural studies. Reflexivity and positivity in the human sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230625587.
[14] Miller, R.C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Its meaning and consequences. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.92.
[15] Miller, T.R., Baird, T.D., Littlefield, C.M., Kofinas, G., Chapin III, F.S., & Redman, C. L. (2020). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2), article number 46.
[16] Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2019). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237-1249. doi: 10.1002/asi.10326.
[17] Mukerji, C., & Schudson, M. (Eds.) (2019). Rethinking popular culture: Contempory perspectives in cultural studies. Oakland: University of California Press
[18] Reckwitz, A., & Black, S. (2019). The invention of creativity: Modern society and the culture of the new. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
[19] Schroeder, M.J. (2022). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity: The Tower of Babel in the age of two cultures. Philosophies, 7(2), article number 26. doi: 10.3390/philosophies7020026.
[20] Seidman, S. (1997). Relativizing sociology: The challenge of cultural studies. In Difference troubles: Queering social theory and sexual politics (pp. 61-80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511557910.005.
[21] Turner, B.S., & Rojek, C. (2001). Society and culture: Principles of scarcity and solidarity. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446220689.
[22] Vienni-Baptista, B. (2022). Cultural studies of collaborative science and technology. In F. Darbelay (Ed.), Elgar encyclopedia of interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity (pp. 139-143). Cheltenham and Camberley: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781035317967.ch30.
[23] Vienni-Baptista, B., Fletcher, I., Lyall, C., & Pohl, Ch. (2022). Embracing heterogeneity: Why plural understandings strengthen interdisciplinary research. Science and Public Policy, 49(6), 865-977. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scac034.
[24] Wagner, C.S., Roessner, J.D., Bobb, K., Klein, J.T., Boyack, K.W., Keyton, J., Rafols, I., & Börner, K. (2019). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004.