Article Volume 27, No. 1, 2025

The hero archetype and the semiotics of liberation struggle in Oles Sanin’s film “Dovbush”: Between historical allusion and visual narrative

Maksym Demydenko
Received 06.02.2025 Revised 29.05.2025 Accepted 30.06.2025 Pages 58–65 652 Views

Abstract

The actualisation of the image of the national hero in times of war, under conditions of informational pressure and cultural decolonisation, is one of the key challenges for contemporary Ukrainian visual culture. The aim of this study was to conduct an interdisciplinary analysis of Oles Sanin’s film “Dovbush” as a cultural text, in which new models of heroism were shaped through semiotic, aesthetic, and mythological means. Cinema increasingly functions as an instrument in the formation of collective identity, where the figure of the hero acquired significance not only as an artistic image, but also as an archetypal marker of historical transformation. The article traced, how the film’s visual language created a complex system of signs and symbols, in particular: the hero’s body, blood, earth, the cross, water, and the Carpathian landscape were presented not merely as elements of artistic composition, but as bearers of traumatic experience, collective memory, and ritual structures. The Carpathian space in the film appeared not as a picturesque backdrop, but as a sacred chronotope, shaping the spiritual topography of the narrative and acting as an active participant in the hero’s ritual transformation. It was revealed that the film’s structure followed the ritual logic of initiation: betrayal, flight, dedication, sacrifice, death, and resurrection, forming a sacred formula of the narrative of resistance. The image of Oleksa Dovbush emerged as an archetypal figure of the leader, integrating the motifs of avenger, martyr, and cultural mediator between the trauma of the past and the nation-building perspective of the present. The study also included a comparative analysis of the film with other examples of Ukrainian historical cinema, which made it possible to discern a shared patterned model in the formation of the visual narrative of national resistance. Particular attention was paid to the figure of the woman in the film as the bearer of sacred knowledge and collective intuition. The film’s public reception confirmed its status as a national screen myth. The practical value of the research lies in the proposed model of film analysis as a ritual narrative, which may be applied in the fields of cultural studies, film analysis, memory studies, and the study of national identity in wartime conditions

Show full abstract

Keywords

Suggested citation

Copy citation
Demydenko, M. (2025). The hero archetype and the semiotics of liberation struggle in Oles Sanin’s film “Dovbush”: Between historical allusion and visual narrative. Culture and Contemporaneity, 27(1), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.63009/cac/1.2025.58

References

Show all references
  1. Betlii, O. (2022). The identity politics of heritage: Decommunization, decolonization, and derussification of Kyiv monuments after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Journal of Applied History, 4(1-2), 149-169. doi: 10.1163/25895893-bja10031.
  2. Bezruchko, O., & Stepanenko, N. (2024). Cinema as a basis for the formation/creation of modern national identity. Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts. Series in Audiovisual Art and Production, 7(1), 20-30. doi: 10.31866/2617-2674.7.1.2024.302756.
  3. Binbin, S., Kravchenko, N., & Matvieieva, S. (2022). Archaic archetypes and symbols of the Ukrainian and Russian peoples: To debunk the myth of a single people. Amazonia Investiga, 11(59), 184-193. doi: 10.34069/AI/2022.59.11.17.
  4. Black Raven. (2019). IMDb. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11386020/.
  5. Campbell, J. (2004). The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  6. Castello Branco, P., & Lihus, M. (2023). Perspectives on Ukrainian cinema: Constructing national identity and cultural resilience. Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image, 15(1), 11-13. doi: 10.34619/dbsq-ibhe.
  7. Cyborgs: Heroes never die. (2017). IMDb. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7691572/.
  8. Demeschenko, V. (2023). Features of genre formation in film art of the 21st century. Interdisciplinary Cultural and Humanities Review, 2(2), 11-19. doi: 10.59214/2786-7110-2023-2-2-11-19.
  9. Demydenko, M. (2022). National images and symbols of visual Ukrainian cinematography in the works of foreign scholars. Contemporary Art, 18, 141-150. doi: 10.31500/2309-8813.18.2022.269722.
  10. Demydenko, M., & Markhaichuk, N. (2024). Visual representation of historical space in Ukrainian feature films (2000-2020). Ukrainian Culture: The Past, Modern Ways of Development, 48, 256-264. doi: 10.35619/ucpmk.v48i.781.
  11. Dovbush. (2023). IMDb. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt21833376/.
  12. Griza, V., Honcharuk, S., Mykhalov, V., Barnych, M., & Balaban, O. (2023). Changes in the representation of heroes in contemporary Ukrainian cinema. Journal of European Studies, 53(4), 384-391. doi: 10.1177/00472441231206550.
  13. Hirsch, M. (2012). The generation of postmemory: Writing and visual culture after the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.
  14. Khlevniuk, D., & Noordenbos, B. (2024). The temporality of memory politics: An analysis of Russian state media narratives on the war in Ukraine. The British Journal of Sociology, 76(2), 390-406. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13171.
  15. Kruty 1918. (2019). IMDb. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8009354/.
  16. Marchenko, S. (2023). Non-fiction cinema of independent Ukraine. Images, 34(43), 57-75. doi: 10.14746/i.2023.34.43.4.
  17. Olzacka, E. (2023). Ukrainian cinema and cultural mobilization during the Russian invasion (2022). Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image, 15(1), 14-30. doi: 10.34619/wfkq-pbln.
  18. Sachleben, M. (2024). Contested identities, hunger, and emigration: Themes in Ukrainian cinema to explain the present day. Czech Journal of International Relations, 59(1), 153-176. doi: 10.32422/cjir.771.
  19. Sas, N. (2023). Hero and villain archetypes in the context of delinquent behaviour. Ukrainian Society, 2, 43-52. doi: 10.15407/socium2023.02.043.
  20. Shumylovych, B. (2023). Cinematic culture during the war in Ukraine: Surviving the year of brutalities. Images, 34(43), 111-126. doi: 10.14746/i.2023.34.43.7.
  21. The Inglorious Serfs. (2020). IMDb. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12166434/?ref_=fn_all_ttl_1.
  22. Törnquist-Plewa, B., & Yurchuk, Yu. (2017). Memory politics in contemporary Ukraine: Reflections from the postcolonial perspective. Memory Studies, 12(6), 699-720. doi: 10.1177/1750698017727806.
  23. Turner, V.W. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
  24. Vidaud, A. (2024). The question of language in contemporary Ukrainian cinema. Studies in World Cinema, 4(2), 135-156. doi: 10.1163/26659891-bja10041.
  25. Wylegała, A., & Głowacka-Grajper, M. (2020). The burden of the past: History, memory, and identity in contemporary Ukraine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvx8b7rg.
  26. Zaporozhchenko, V., & Ishchenko, M. (2024). National myths and symbols in modern Ukrainian cinema. Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts. Series in Audiovisual Art and Production, 7(1), 31-41. doi: 10.31866/2617-2674.7.1.2024.302757.
  27. Zhurzhenko, T. (2022). Legislating historical memory in post-Soviet Ukraine. In E. Barkan & A. Lang (Eds.), Memory laws and historical justice (pp. 97-130). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94914-3_5.