Features of aesthetics in the development of ergonomic web products for users with disabilities
Abstract
The study discussed the need to create an inclusive digital environment, where web products should provide equal access for people with different abilities, combining visual appeal, ergonomics, and accessibility for a full user experience. The purpose of the study was to analyse key aesthetic principles and design solutions that ensured visual appeal, comfort, and full accessibility of web products for users with various types of disabilities. The main research findings indicated that the aesthetics of inclusive web products were shaped by a harmonious blend of visual appeal, functionality, and accessibility. The study emphasised the importance of utilising a clear structure, logical navigation, and understandable interface elements to facilitate interaction for users with diverse disabilities. Key aesthetic and ergonomic principles and techniques have been identified, the application of which ensured the creation of accessible content within the context of inclusive web design. The necessity of ensuring sufficient colour contrast, design adaptability to various devices, and support for alternative information perception methods had been established. It was determined that consideration of the needs of users with disabilities contributed to a positive aesthetic experience and enhanced the overall quality of the web product. It was found that the impact of emotional response and social inclusion were important criteria for evaluating inclusive web products. Research has shown that design that made users with disabilities feel respected and included significantly improved their overall interaction and perception experience. The practical significance lie in demonstrating how integrating aesthetics is ensuring accessibility and delivering high-quality user experiences, thereby shifting web development from mere technical compliance to an inclusive design approach
Keywords
Suggested citation
Copy citationReferences
Show all references- Afuzova, H. (2021). Higher education in the context of European values of diversity and inclusion. Higher Education of Ukraine, 3, 67-74. doi: 10.31392/NPU-VOU.2021.3(82).09.
- Alajarmeh, N. (2022). Evaluating the accessibility of public health websites: An exploratory cross-country study. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21, 771-789. doi: 10.1007/s10209-020-00788-7.
- Arias-Badia, B., Bestard-Bou, J.J., & Hermosa-Ramírez, I. (2022). Designing, making, and validating accessible products and services: An updated account of users’ perspectives. Journal of Audiovisual Translation, 5(2), 57-75. doi: 10.47476/jat.v5i2.2022.229.
- Asean Disability Forum. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://aseandisabilityforum.com/.
- Berdynskykh, S., Yakovliev, M., & Pashkevych, K. (2025). Creative experimentation and the generation of innovative ideas in artistic design. Art and Design, 8(1), 11-22. doi: 10.30857/2617-0272.2025.1.1.
- Chmal, J., Ptasińska, M., & Skublewska-Paszkowska, M. (2022). Analysis of the ergonomics of e-commerce websites. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 25, 330-336. doi: 10.35784/jcsi.3016.
- Davydenko, H. (2023). Digital inclusion and accessibility: Social digitalisation. Vinnytsia: TVORY. doi: 10.58521/978-617-552-348-3-2023-236.
- Disability Gateway. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.disabilitygateway.gov.au/.
- Fernandes, K., Paramananthan, S., Cockburn, L., & Nganji, J. (2023). Readily available but how accessible? An analysis of the web accessibility of healthcare-related resources. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 13(2), 188-215. doi: 10.17411/jacces.v13i2.421.
- Inal, Y., Rizvanoğlu, K., & Yesilada, Y. (2019). Web accessibility in Turkey: Awarness, understanding and practices of user experience professionals. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18, 387-398. doi: 10.1007/s10209-017-0603-3.
- International Disability Alliance. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org.
- King, A.J., Lazard, A.J., & White, S.R. (2019). The influence of visual complexity on initial user impressions: Testing the persuasive model of web design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(5), 497-510. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1602167.
- Klym, V., & Tarasenko, Yu. (2022). Web testing for inclusive: Audit for reengineering. Bulletin of Vinnytsia Polytechnic Institute, 3, 60-66. doi: 10.31649/1997-9266-2022-162-3-60-66.
- Kurt, S. (2018). Moving toward a universally accessible web: Web accessibility and education. Assistive Technology, 31(4), 199-208. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1414086.
- Leite, M.V.R., Scatalon, L.P., Freire, A.P., & Eler, M.M. (2021). Accessibility in the mobile development industry in Brazil: Awareness, knowledge, adoption, motivations and barriers. Journal of Systems and Software, 177, article number 110942. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.110942.
- Matveieva, O. (2022). Gender-mainstreaming in digital democracy development on the road to European integration: The case of Ukraine. Scientific Notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University. Series: Public Administration & Governance, 33(6), 117-125. doi: 10.32782/TNU-2663-6468/2022.6/18.
- Miller, A. (2024). Disabilities and user experience. An exploratory case study of survey and website accessibility. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 14(2), 35-58. doi: 10.17411/jacces.v14i2.513.
- Miniukovich, A., & Figl, K. (2023). The effect of prototypicality on webpage aesthetics, usability, and trustworthiness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 179, article number 103103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103103.
- Pakki, A. (2024). Current trends in digital transformations in the context of inclusive development. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology, 9(1), 40-45. doi: 10.36887/2415-8453-2024-1-6.
- Pihavaara, J. (2020). Integrating accessibility into digital design processes – a systemic approach. (Master’s thesis, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden).
- Radionova, I. (2025). Inclusive digital transformation: The political dimension. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series: Philosophical-Political Studies, 59, 367-374. doi: 10.30970/PPS.2025.59.42.
- Remember the milk. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.rememberthemilk.com/.
- Saripalli, S. (2019). UX and significance of web aesthetics for people with disability web aesthetics for disabled people. Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, 16(2), 4-9.
- Skierniewska, M., & Skroban, K. (2018). Accessibility of utility software for disabled and elderly people in the light of WCAG standards. Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, 50, 141-152.
- Sviryda, A. (2018). Mobile app for people with disabilities. Behance. Retrieved from https://www.behance.net/gallery/62300413/Mobile-app-for-people-with-disabilities.
- Top disability websites. From the focus on disability team. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://topdisabilitywebsites.co.uk/.
- Vollenwyder, B., Iten, G.H., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., & Mekler, E.D. (2019). Salient beliefs influencing the intention to consider Web Accessibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 352-360. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.016.
- Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/.